Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 12:00 pm
I appreciate those extra details - good practical workflow stuff.
I was just referring to the general crispness of the animation and - yes - good matching of gestures and word timing. I think you might be right about using a video camera for word/gesture synch.
It sounds like your success was due to a combination of brute force and simplicity by design. The time and effort you put in really does show I think.
2.5 years for a 13 minute movie ... and a success at the end. Why not? This is a testimony not only to your persistence but to the motivating power of a truly funny script.
I could easily see myself spending similar amounts of time on my current project. But, only a month in, it is enough fun that the prospect doesn't worry me. I am learning the tools at the same time. My script is not comic though. I might have to think about that. Someone else on this forum (or was it the other) has commented on the centrality of a funny script for a successful animation project.
Anyway warble warble warble - well done again.
I was just referring to the general crispness of the animation and - yes - good matching of gestures and word timing. I think you might be right about using a video camera for word/gesture synch.
It sounds like your success was due to a combination of brute force and simplicity by design. The time and effort you put in really does show I think.
2.5 years for a 13 minute movie ... and a success at the end. Why not? This is a testimony not only to your persistence but to the motivating power of a truly funny script.
I could easily see myself spending similar amounts of time on my current project. But, only a month in, it is enough fun that the prospect doesn't worry me. I am learning the tools at the same time. My script is not comic though. I might have to think about that. Someone else on this forum (or was it the other) has commented on the centrality of a funny script for a successful animation project.
Anyway warble warble warble - well done again.