Some pics...

nobudget · Post by **nobudget** » Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:40 pm

Hmmm, maybe the head of the horse could be a bit bigger and the make-up of the clown's face a bit brighter but I really like the flowers and grass field in the foreground. But next time maybe something a bit more...artistic, this is too photo-realistic for my taste. Keep up the good work!

Reindert.
www.nobudgetvideo.com

Hiddicop · Post by **Hiddicop** » Tue Mar 01, 2005 8:52 pm

I'm sorry to say Nobudget that I think you've missed the point of this image.

You don't see the depth. The symbolism of childhood haunting the mind of the old man, the sophisticated social criticism merged in to 307200 pixels. Don't you see how it so clearly shows the beauty of nature, the mans loving, the wonder of life framed in such a small image? Dont you see how the picture is a symbol for freedom in the eyes of the caged man? Dont you realize how it shows some of todays most serius issues?

I'm sorry if you too non-intellectual to see the depth in the masterpiece.

nobudget · Post by **nobudget** » Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:06 pm

Oh wait, I cleaned my monitor and NOW I see it! The old man haunted, nice job. Great social critisism, I've never seen nature looking THIS beautiful...and clear too! So many pixels merged in such a small image, cool! I totally see todays symbolic issues of freedom now, and even some issues of tomorrow behind that haunted man. Great job!

Reindert.
www.nobudgetvideo.com

PS. It's "youR too non-intellectual", not "you", And "THIS masterpiece", not "THE". Who's the intellectual man now huh?

Hiddicop · Post by **Hiddicop** » Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:19 pm

PS. It's "youR too non-intellectual", not "you", And "THIS masterpiece", not "THE". Who's the intellectual man now huh?

It's "you're too non-intellectual" not "your too non-intellectual".

nobudget · Post by **nobudget** » Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:43 pm

"non-intellectual" is not a word. And if there was a smiley with a tongue sticking out I would use it.

Reindert.
www.nobudgetvideo.com

Hiddicop · Post by **Hiddicop** » Tue Mar 01, 2005 9:59 pm

Eh, it isn't? Check this out my dear pompous fellow:

http://dict.die.net/nonintellectual/

Ain't so pontifical now, eh?

If there was a smiley with it's tongue sticking out I wouldn't use it. I'm too intellectual...

Post by **Lost Marble** » Tue Mar 01, 2005 10:45 pm

I think this discussion has diverged and is not exactly cromulent anymore.

Hiddicop · Post by **Hiddicop** » Tue Mar 01, 2005 11:15 pm

I think this discussion has diverged and is not exactly cromulent anymore.

Perhaps a little bit. There shoule be a specific forum for more intellectual discussions, including banning of non-intellectual users - such as our dear nobudget here.

Don't think you've seen the last of me, Nobudget!

nobudget · Post by **nobudget** » Tue Mar 01, 2005 11:18 pm

You are right mister Marble, we were just playing around, that's what those creative types do sometimes. I think I can speak for both of us when I say we're not too serious about it...right? ok, back on topic now!

Reindert.
www.nobudgetvideo.com

PS. I don't see an "-" in "nonintellectual"...Sorry, how non-cromulent of me

Jack Payback · Post by **Jack Payback** » Wed Mar 02, 2005 5:14 am

All are embiggened by the cromulance of this subject.

-jack

Agent · Post by **Agent** » Wed Mar 02, 2005 9:25 am

Hiddicop: Miscellaneous Chit-Chat is the right place for you

Hiddicop · Post by **Hiddicop** » Wed Mar 02, 2005 5:27 pm

Yet another pic:

P.S:

PS. I don't see an "-" in "nonintellectual"...Sorry, how non-cromulent of me

There's nothing grammaticly incorrect in adding a "-". But yeah, you're right: It was non-cromulent of you.

jahnocli · Post by **jahnocli** » Thu Mar 03, 2005 10:51 am

grammaticly?

Hiddicop · Post by **Hiddicop** » Thu Mar 03, 2005 11:52 am

grammaticly?

Hmm... Maybe you call it punctuation? I'm not really sure, but you're probably right; "grammiticly" probably is the wrong word.

I'm so sorry, Mr. Never-make-a-misstake!

Hiddicop · Post by **Hiddicop** » Tue Mar 15, 2005 12:59 pm

Ok, I got a interesting idea, and I tried it, and to my gerat suprise it actualy worked (something that dosn't happen often). This pictureis made in moho, entirely!

It's quite simple. I made a square that coverd the entire output-area. I made it gradient green, so it's darker on the top and lighter on the bottom, and then added a splotchy-effect with scale 1. I renderd it and saved it as a image. I imported the image to a new moho-file and rotated it in 3D so it looked like a ground. I renderd it again, and saved as a new image. I imported the new image to a new moho-file and added bones to it. And by translating and rotating the bones I could create hills and holes. I added a nice sky and a sun, and a sprucetree. By using masks I made it look like the tree was behing the hill. The road is just a simple shape.