Page 2 of 2

Posted: Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:12 am
by chucky
I thought the animation was as 7Powah says, first and foremost a communication regarding the flyer and CD. I think to that extent it is fine.
For his purpose maybe too much bugs bunnying might be too cutesy for his audience.
The animation is limited I guess for the mere fact that it's simplicity comes off more garage than Disney, I understand why that would be appropriate for that underground feel.
7Powah I think Mkelly's criticism is meant to be constructive, and I think maybe a little bit of shoulder and body sway could help a little but I do agree that full 'animation' would be too much.
I like the character and the car looks great, even if the perspective doesn't quite match.
I also enjoyed the trash talk .... but please no crotch grabbing ..eeeeeehihhee . :wink:
P.S, I'd share my pain, but you'd die laughing. :P

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 2:18 pm
by unkledunkle
You know I noticed just how old this post was after I commented. OOOps.

Posted: Sat Nov 22, 2008 10:42 pm
by sinclair
It's depressing that this post has gotten more attention than "Raven" and "tastes like chicken"-

Posted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 1:09 pm
by ingie01
I spent 30 years teaching 7th and 8th graders. That was a tantrum!