South Park walkcycle

Wondering how to accomplish a certain animation task? Ask here.

Moderators: Víctor Paredes, Belgarath, slowtiger

Post Reply
joe52
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 11:41 pm

South Park walkcycle

Post by joe52 »

I would like to duplicate the walk cycle, used in South Park in Anime Studio Pro. The Ars Technica, July 1, 1999 Dr. Evil interview, http://www.spscriptorium.com/SPinfo/Mak ... thPark.htm, discusses making the characters to move in a very jerky, "amateur production" style as follows (which I don't understand):

It's animated on 2's and at 24 frames per second (with a process called a 3-2 pulldown to transfer the rendered images to 30 fps video).

The curves used to define the movement of objects are applied on every other frame instead of on every frame.

They use a "stepped" curve type instead of a smooth algorithm like spline or Bezier, that literally looks like a series of steps, the motion looks jerky because the key values from frame to frame jump from one discrete value to another with no interpolation.
User avatar
madrobot
Posts: 670
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:07 pm

Post by madrobot »

Well you want to avoid smooth keys.
But simply changing your keys to linear isn't going to cut it.

Saying that the values jump from one key to the other
is just a long-winded way of saying that there's no inbetweens
generated by the software.

So it's basically the most simple type of keying,
which ironically can be fiddly to get out of animation software.
It becomes like stop motion, you want all keys, no tweens.

I'd tackle it by blocking out the walk cycle keyframes,
getting those how I want them, then get in and duplicate keys
so it's running on "2s", which means frames 1 and 2 are the same,
3 and 4 same, and so on.
User avatar
slowtiger
Posts: 6256
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 6:53 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany
Contact:

Post by slowtiger »

Couldn't you just set all those key's interpolation to "step" instead?
User avatar
heyvern
Posts: 7042
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 4:49 am

Post by heyvern »

It absolutely cracks me up that there needs to be some technical explanation for "step" interpolated key frames of "South Park" walk cycles. I just find this very funny. ;)

-vern
User avatar
mkelley
Posts: 1647
Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 5:29 pm
Location: Sunny Florida
Contact:

Post by mkelley »

Vern,

It is funny looked at a certain way... but then again, perhaps not given that smooth animation is not necessary the be-all end-all of techniques. Perhaps another, less humorous, way of looking at it is that computer animation often takes it for granted (and automates) things which we may not necessary want done.

In any case, for the original poster ST is right -- just set all your keys to step and you don't have to worry about any duplication of the keys in the timeline. As it moves from key to key the motion will indeed be herkey-jerkey.
User avatar
slowtiger
Posts: 6256
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 6:53 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany
Contact:

Post by slowtiger »

vern: Yes, it's funny. And it supports my theory that the default settings of any program must be chosen with care, because 90% of all users will never bother to change them. Proof: all the videos with that ever-so-slow-flowing animation because all the programs inbetween automatically.
User avatar
heyvern
Posts: 7042
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2005 4:49 am

Post by heyvern »

I almost thought their answer to that question in the article was possibly "tongue in cheek" or kind of a joke. Over explaining something simple in the same way as using high end 3D software to create construction paper cut out animation. ;) Most of the answer regarding 24fpx and 2/3 pull down has NOTHING to do with STEP KEYS at all. Any animation done on computer at 24 fps that goes to video will need that, whether it's south park or a realistic rendered effect from a sci-fi show.

The only mention that addressed the "jerkiness" was at the end with the explanation of what a "step" or "hold" key frame interpolation is. The 2/3 pull down might add some "blur" to the jerkiness possibly to smooth it out and make it look more "real". I suppose animating on 2's would REQURE 24fps? Can you animate on 2's on the computer at 30fps? Obviously 4's would be tricky. ;)

-vern
User avatar
slowtiger
Posts: 6256
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 6:53 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany
Contact:

Post by slowtiger »

Fortunately (or not) you can have it whatever way you want now. On 1's, 2's, 3's or whatever, or mix them all up.
User avatar
TheChewanater
Posts: 134
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2009 1:25 am

Post by TheChewanater »

slowtiger wrote:Fortunately (or not) you can have it whatever way you want now. On 1's, 2's, 3's or whatever, or mix them all up.
What exactly does "animating on (x)" mean?
ImageImage
Genete
Posts: 3483
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 3:27 pm
Location: España / Spain

Post by Genete »

TheChewanater wrote:
slowtiger wrote:Fortunately (or not) you can have it whatever way you want now. On 1's, 2's, 3's or whatever, or mix them all up.
What exactly does "animating on (x)" mean?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traditiona ... on_twos.22
-G
User avatar
madrobot
Posts: 670
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 3:07 pm

Post by madrobot »

slowtiger wrote:Couldn't you just set all those key's interpolation to "step" instead?
Cool, I wasn't sure if that would do it.
Good to know. Thanks

( :oops: )
:D
Post Reply