exporting in as7
Moderators: Víctor Paredes, Belgarath, slowtiger
exporting in as7
When i export video in AS7 two bars appear on top of the window, can somebody tell me why AS7 shows 2 bars instead of one?
May be several of you consider this a stupid question but im just curious.
May be several of you consider this a stupid question but im just curious.
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 1:10 am
Re: exporting in as7
It means you have a duel core processor ASP can handle up to 4 I think.PARKER wrote:When i export video in AS7 two bars appear on top of the window, can somebody tell me why AS7 shows 2 bars instead of one?
May be several of you consider this a stupid question but im just curious.
But for single core users (IMO) ASP7 renders a tad slower than AS6, but not that much its less than 20% slower but it might just be that 7 has more behind the scene stuff that 6 didn't have that makes it a tad slower.
Last edited by sbtamu on Wed Jun 23, 2010 12:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: exporting in as7
So that means AS7 can render much faster than as6?sbtamu wrote:It means you have a duel core processor ASP can handle up to 4 I think.PARKER wrote:When i export video in AS7 two bars appear on top of the window, can somebody tell me why AS7 shows 2 bars instead of one?
May be several of you consider this a stupid question but im just curious.
Re: exporting in as7
YESPARKER wrote:So that means AS7 can render much faster than as6?sbtamu wrote:It means you have a duel core processor ASP can handle up to 4 I think.PARKER wrote:When i export video in AS7 two bars appear on top of the window, can somebody tell me why AS7 shows 2 bars instead of one?
May be several of you consider this a stupid question but im just curious.
But for single core users (IMO) ASP7 renders a tad slower than AS6, but not that much its less than 20% slower but it might just be that 7 has more behind the scene stuff that 6 didn't have that makes it a tad slower.
Re: exporting in as7
My computer has two cores but yet as7 is slower than as6 when rendering.sbtamu wrote:YESPARKER wrote:So that means AS7 can render much faster than as6?sbtamu wrote: It means you have a duel core processor ASP can handle up to 4 I think.
But for single core users (IMO) ASP7 renders a tad slower than AS6, but not that much its less than 20% slower but it might just be that 7 has more behind the scene stuff that 6 didn't have that makes it a tad slower.
Re: exporting in as7
That's something that SM will have to address, from what I was told, the duel core rendering is supposed to be faster.PARKER wrote:My computer has two cores but yet as7 is slower than as6 when rendering.sbtamu wrote:YESPARKER wrote: So that means AS7 can render much faster than as6?
But for single core users (IMO) ASP7 renders a tad slower than AS6, but not that much its less than 20% slower but it might just be that 7 has more behind the scene stuff that 6 didn't have that makes it a tad slower.
- Víctor Paredes
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5814
- Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 12:18 am
- Location: Barcelona/Chile
- Contact:
That's weird, Parker, I have tested AS7 rendering on 1, 2 and 4 cores and the result is always the expected, faster where there are more cores.






Moho co-owner
Previously Rigged animation supervisor: My father's dragon, Wolfwalkers & Star Wars Visions "Screecher's Reach"
My personal Youtube Channel
- Darramouss
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 2:34 am
- Location: Melbourne, Australia
Definitely faster for me!! I had an animation that took 7 minutes to render. ASP7 takes under 2 now. Love that it uses more than one core to render!!
Suggestion to Mike, maybe a preference feature that allows you to specify how many cores are going to be used to render, like Blender does, and also the capability to use more than 4 cores.
(Awesome upgrade, BTW. Awesome.)
Suggestion to Mike, maybe a preference feature that allows you to specify how many cores are going to be used to render, like Blender does, and also the capability to use more than 4 cores.
(Awesome upgrade, BTW. Awesome.)
Sheer will is my greatest talent - Sledge Hammer!
It seems that people are getting really different results with AS7 rendering speeds. I think someone posted in this forum that multi-core rendering worked with some of their codecs, but not all. There's also a theory on the kellytown forum that Intel processors may not be able to render using multiple cores.
I have an Intel Mac with two cores (New Mac mini, JUST ARRIVED TODAY!! WOOHOOO!) and it uses both cores for rendering.
Any issues with rendering times can't be settled via "anecdotal stories" from random unscientific sources, especially from a group of self proclaimed "smith mcro haters". There has to be some kind of benchmarking done based on some kind of verifiable set of tests. I can't accept the statements from someone saying "I think it's slower. It feels slower. I timed it and it's kind of slower I think so anyway."
Someone needs to do multiple renders of the same thing a bunch of times on different systems to get an average overall time. Then you need some way to figure out the speed comparisons of ONE processor versus two. For goodness sakes what if someones email was downloading automatically during a render test? Or some background task started up? My PC becomes totally useless when the dang indexer starts up.
-vern
Any issues with rendering times can't be settled via "anecdotal stories" from random unscientific sources, especially from a group of self proclaimed "smith mcro haters". There has to be some kind of benchmarking done based on some kind of verifiable set of tests. I can't accept the statements from someone saying "I think it's slower. It feels slower. I timed it and it's kind of slower I think so anyway."
Someone needs to do multiple renders of the same thing a bunch of times on different systems to get an average overall time. Then you need some way to figure out the speed comparisons of ONE processor versus two. For goodness sakes what if someones email was downloading automatically during a render test? Or some background task started up? My PC becomes totally useless when the dang indexer starts up.
-vern
I do not see any "smith micro(sic) haters" on this thread, heyvern.heyvern wrote: Any issues with rendering times can't be settled via "anecdotal stories" from random unscientific sources, especially from a group of self proclaimed "smith mcro haters". There has to be some kind of benchmarking done based on some kind of verifiable set of tests. I can't accept the statements from someone saying "I think it's slower. It feels slower. I timed it and it's kind of slower I think so anyway."
-vern
